Panel reactive antibodies is a debatable indicator of post-transplant function and survival


M.L. Mc Cahery, M.C. Clahsen-van Groningen, K.A.L. Mauff, J. Kal-van Gestel, A.T. Rowshani

Chair(s): dr. D.A. Hesselink

Thursday 9 march 2017

12:30 - 12:45h

Categories: Poster - Klinisch

Parallel session: Postersessie - Klinisch 1


Panel reactive antibodies (PRA) estimation is widely used in determining sensitization status and severity. Currently there is no strong evidence supporting that PRA% is predictive as a prognostic measurement for renal allograft outcome.  Here, we investigated the value of PRA% as a prognostic indicator of post-transplant function and long-term renal allograft survival.

All patients who received a renal allograft at our Center from 2010 through 2014 were included. We retrospectively analyzed the association of current-pretransplant PRA% (cPRA%) and highest measured  PRA% (hPRA%) (cut-off  value 6%) with the incidence of rejection and it’s association with kidney function. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1, control group, is negative for cPRA% and hPRA%. Group 2 is hPRA% positive and cPRA% negative. Group 3 is cPRA% positive and hPRA% positive. Clinical data were collected.

A total of 942 patients was included and 866 for cause renal biopsies were obtained from 471 patients. Strikingly, there is no significant relation between hPRA% and increased biopsy proven rejection rate (P=0.08) No significant difference in eGFR at 3 and 12 months post-transplant was found between groups. The hPRA% positive groups had a trend in developing more proteinuria at 3 and 12 months post-transplant  compared to the control group (P=0.05).  Also no  significant difference was found between the  hPRA% positive group and the cPRA% and hPRA% positive group (P=1.00).

We conclude that cPRA% and hPRA% values do not predict the occurrence of rejection and are not associated with graft function and proteinuria up to one year after transplantation. We therefor question the use of PRA% in this setting in prioriting patients for eligibility for solid organ transplantation.